Science and art are two major disciplines in the academic arena. Many scholars were cared for by them. However, many scientists wonder if these two disciplines are the same or have striking similarities. Of course, the variance in their identity as science and art clearly shows their demarcation. Their differences lie in particular in their procedural dimensions and the end products they offer.
Science relies heavily on strict rules and conventions. It is based solely on logical knowledge that is very objective. There is room for replication, especially if researchers follow the given formulas and experiments. On the other hand, art is generally a product whose subjectivity precludes the strict and objective nature of science. Artistic creations can be found on the artists & # 39; Feelings or expressions towards things in nature and / or the human environment that serve the artist as the main subject. Artistic productions are subject to the opinion of the viewer and thus provide space for pluralistic views of what they represent.
Another notable difference between art and science is that science eliminates human emotions and relies heavily on proven facts that have been identified through experimentation. However, art appeals firmly to the emotional impulses of its esteem. It leads the viewer into a slightly different world of thinking, finding out the message behind the lines, forms and colors of artistic support, after he has recognized the external, aesthetic composition of the artworks.
Nonetheless, science and art are only sides of the same coin, academic siblings of the same parents sharing and learning from each other. Excellent artists are scientists and learned scientists are artists. Artists systematically go out to come out with aesthetically pleasing forms in sculpture, textiles, music, dance and so on. They engage in thorough problem-solving activities involving the use of high-level thinking skills and many experiments in their workshops and studios, just as serious scientists would do several experiments in the laboratory.
Scientists who have made great strides in history are those who applied the foundations of art, such as harmony, contrast, rhythm, etc. to bring their thought-provoking theories, discoveries, and inventions to the forefront. Successful engineers are the ones who perform the thorough pre-planning, layout design, prototyping, and modeling fundamentals that are largely reserved for the artists.
Great artists are the ones who implement the basic procedural strategies in science to refine their artistic creations by providing sound philosophical concepts and design features that would appeal to the target market. Powerful scientists are those who carefully set in motion the careful planning and principles of art to make new discoveries.
To this end, I would argue that art and science are different in their products, but the processes by which the products are born are practically the same, though apparently they wear different clothing from the surface.